Updated 2 min read

What is the women's health data gap?

The women’s health data gap is the distance between how much data women’s bodies generate and how little of it reaches research that could improve care. It shows up in two numbers.

The funding side: across 64 conditions studied, the six female-specific conditions that make up 14% of the women’s health burden (measured in disability-adjusted life years) received under 1% of 2019–23 research funding.

The data side: the three largest menstrual apps (Clue, Flo, Period Tracker) have been downloaded more than 250 million times, and Flo alone reports around 70 million monthly active users. The raw material for understanding the feminine cycle exists at a scale medicine has never had before.

So why doesn’t the data reach research?

Because of where it lives and how it is governed:

The result: the most abundant new source of women’s health data is the least trustworthy, and the most trustworthy sources are the hardest to use.

Closing the gap without repeating the failure

The gap will not be closed by another app that hoards data, nor by regulation alone. It requires infrastructure where the data is research-grade because it is consented: each woman holds her own record, decides who accesses it and why, and can revoke that access at any time.

Health Data Safe’s Women’s Health project is building it with the FemTech ecosystem: high-quality, ethically sourced datasets on the feminine cycle, held under explicit consent on open-source infrastructure, governed by a Swiss non-profit foundation whose statutes treat health data as a common good.