Updated 2 min read

What does "health data as a common good" mean?

“Health data as a common good” is the phrase at the heart of Health Data Safe’s mission. It gets misread in two opposite directions.

What it is not

It is not collectivisation. A common good does not mean the state, a hospital or a foundation owns your data, or that your record is poured into a shared pool. Each person keeps complete control over their own data; that control is the starting point, not the casualty.

It is also not a market. The opposite failure is treating health data as a commodity: bought, sold, and monetised by whoever holds it, which is how the apps holding the most intimate data about women’s bodies became, structurally, among the least accountable.

What it is

A common good is a resource governed so that it serves everyone’s benefit under rules no single actor can bend. For health data, Health Data Safe’s statutes make that concrete:

Why statutes rather than promises

These commitments are not internal policies that a board might revise. They are written into the statutes of a Swiss foundation, and Swiss foundation law makes that mission permanent: a foundation is bound to its stated purpose under federal supervision. A company can pivot; this legal form cannot.

The practical consequence: an individual contribution (your consented data) can serve the collective good (research, better care) without ever leaving your control or becoming someone’s asset. Individual good, collective good, and the common good of society are pursued together rather than traded against each other.

Read the essential articles of our statutes, or see who owns your health data.